Texas Legislators Push for Major Water Infrastructure Funding
As Texas confronts the increasing threat of water scarcity, state leaders are advocating for substantial investments in water infrastructure. The stakes are high, as a prolonged drought could precipitate a water crisis across the state.
Legislative Initiatives
The discussion surrounding financing options and strategic allocation of funds is set to intensify as State Senator Charles Perry, R-Lubbock, has introduced Senate Bill 7. This legislation, eagerly awaited by the state’s water community, addresses numerous vital issues, including the development of infrastructure necessary for water transport throughout Texas.
“Water scarcity is no longer a distant threat — it’s here, and it’s already disrupting the lives of Texans across the state,” Perry stated. “The bottom line: We are out of time. Texas must act now to secure a reliable water supply for today and for future generations.”
Comprehensive Approach to Water Management
Perry’s proposal is part of broader legislative efforts aimed at restoring and enhancing Texas’ water infrastructure, which encompasses upgrading aging pipes, expanding water supplies, and mitigating flood risks. In parallel, State Representative Cody Harris, R-Palestine, has introduced House Bill 16, focusing on similar objectives.
At an event earlier this month, Harris emphasized the importance of proactive measures: “If we don’t dig in and do the hard work of figuring out how to solve this problem for future generations of Texans, then we have done a huge disservice to the people who elected us.”
Funding Proposals and Differences
Both Perry and Harris have proposed directing up to $1 billion annually toward the Texas Water Fund, initiated in 2023 to finance water initiatives. With strong public support evidenced by a previous $1 billion infrastructure funding approval, state officials anticipate seeking voter endorsement for the new funding proposals.
However, disparities exist between the two chambers. Notably, Harris’ plan would span 10 years, while Perry’s aims for a 16-year duration beginning in 2027. Additionally, their funding sources diverge; the Senate seeks funding through state sales and insurance premium taxes, while the House would rely solely on sales tax revenues.
Key Legislative Differences
The primary contention lies in how to allocate the proposed funds. Perry’s Senate Joint Resolution 66 emphasizes substantial investment in projects generating new water supplies, such as desalination technologies. Conversely, Harris’ House Joint Resolution 7 does not specify allocation details.
Perry Fowler, executive director of the Texas Water Infrastructure Network, commented on the negotiations ahead, stating, “It represents two different approaches, and they’re going to have to work through the differences on them effectively. Good policy is a result of compromise and negotiation, and we are confident that everyone shares the same goal to secure our water future.”
Addressing Critical Water Supply Needs
Both SB 7 and HB 16 are instrumental in securing a sustainable water supply for Texas, a state experiencing rapid population growth expected to increase by 73% by 2070, particularly in urban hubs like Dallas-Fort Worth and Houston. Yet, this growing demand poses substantial challenges; forecasts indicate an 18% decline in water availability, primarily due to diminishing groundwater sources.
If the water supply fails to meet rising demands, experts warn of a potential municipal water disaster by 2030 under a severe drought scenario. A Texas 2036 report projected that the state would require nearly $154 billion in water infrastructure investments by 2050, comprising $59 billion for new supply initiatives and $74 billion for maintenance of aging systems.
Conclusion
The ongoing legislative discussions will be crucial in addressing Texas’ water infrastructure challenges. As state leaders navigate these complex issues, the focus remains firmly on ensuring a sustainable water future for all Texans.
Disclosure: Texas 2036 has been a financial supporter of The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit news organization funded by public donations. Financial supporters play no role in the Tribune’s journalism.
